The "Cover-Up Test": How to Tell if That AI Feature Actually Makes Sense
Your team is buzzing about adding AI to your app. But what if you stripped away the hype? Would the feature still stand on its own—or would it vanish into thin air?
Your developer just pitched you an AI feature for your app. Or maybe you saw a competitor add AI and now you're wondering if you should too. Or perhaps you're looking at a proposal that includes "AI-powered" something-or-other and trying to figure out if it's worth the investment.
Here's my simple trick: Cover up the letters "AI" and ask yourself—does this feature still make sense?
After helping dozens of startups navigate their tech decisions, this one test cuts through the hype faster than anything else.
When someone proposes an AI feature, mentally remove "AI" from the description and ask:
If the answer is yes to the first three and no to the last one, you might have a feature worth building. If everything falls apart without that AI label, you're looking at a solution in search of a problem.
When you apply the cover-up test to solid AI features, here's what you find:
1. The Problem Exists Without AI
Good example: "Users waste 20 minutes sorting through their photos to find the ones they want to share."
That's a real problem. AI can solve it faster and better than manual tagging, but the problem exists either way. The feature makes sense because users are already struggling.
2. The Benefit is Concrete and Measurable
Strong features can explain their value in simple terms:
Notice none of those say "uses AI to..." The AI is just how you deliver the benefit, not the benefit itself.
3. AI Actually Makes It Better (Not Just Different)
AI should make things:
If AI just makes something different but not measurably better, question whether you need it.
4. Users Don't Need to Know It's AI
The best AI features just work. Users think "wow, this app is smart" not "wow, this app uses AI." If you have to tell people it's AI for them to appreciate it, the feature probably isn't delivering enough value on its own.
Here are the warning signs that an AI feature is more hype than help:
The Feature Creates a Problem to Solve
Bad example: "Let's add an AI chatbot so users can ask questions!"
Wait—are users actually asking questions right now? Where? Do they struggle to find answers? Or are you creating a new interaction pattern just because you can?
If users aren't already trying to do something, adding AI to do it won't help.
The Old Way Works Fine
Be honest: Does the current solution actually have problems?
If your search function works well and users can find what they need, "AI-powered search" might be solving a problem you don't have. That's money and time you could spend on features users are asking for.
It's Added Solely Because Competitors Have It
"Everyone's adding AI features" isn't a strategy. Your competitor might be making the same mistake you're about to make. Or their users might have different needs than yours.
The Complexity Isn't Worth the Benefit
AI features are expensive to build and maintain:
If the benefit to users is small, that cost might not be justified. Sometimes a simple dropdown menu beats an AI assistant.
Users Have to Change Their Behavior
If your AI feature requires users to do something completely new, adoption will be hard. The best features fit into how people already work, just making it easier or faster.
Let's look at some actual AI feature decisions:
Makes Sense:"Our photo app uses AI to automatically tag faces, so users can search 'photos with Mom' instead of scrolling through thousands of images."
Remove AI: You still have a search feature that solves a real problem (finding specific photos is hard). AI just makes it work way better than manual tagging ever could.
Doesn't Make Sense:"We're adding an AI writing assistant to our project management tool."
Remove AI: Do users struggle with writing in your tool? Are they asking for help? Or are you adding a feature because it sounds cool? If users aren't already trying to write better in your app, this might miss the mark.
Makes Sense:"Our scheduling app uses AI to suggest meeting times based on everyone's calendars and past preferences."
Remove AI: You're solving the annoying problem of email chains with 12 people trying to find a time to meet. The AI just makes the solution work across complex scenarios.
Doesn't Make Sense:"Let's add AI-generated summaries to every email in our inbox."
Remove AI: Are summaries actually useful for short emails? Will users trust them? Do people struggle to read their emails, or do they struggle with too many emails (which summaries don't solve)?
When evaluating an AI feature proposal, work through these questions:
1. What's the actual problem?
Write it down without using the word "AI." If you can't describe a clear problem, you don't need a solution yet.
2. How do users solve this today?
What's their current workaround? What do they hate about it? This tells you what to improve.
3. How will we measure success?
Pick real metrics: time saved, errors reduced, completion rate improved. "Uses AI" isn't a metric.
4. What's the simpler alternative?
Before jumping to AI, could you solve this with:
Sometimes the simple solution is the right solution.
5. What happens when it gets it wrong?
AI makes mistakes. What's the user experience when it does? Is there an easy fix? Or will errors cause major problems?
6. Do we have the data to train it?
AI needs examples to learn from. Do you have enough quality data? If not, can you get it? How long will that take?
Here's what many founders don't realize: AI features are expensive beyond the initial build.
Development costs:
Ongoing costs:
For a small startup with limited resources, one AI feature might eat up the budget for three traditional features. Is it worth it?
Don't get me wrong—AI can be incredible when used right. Build AI features when:
The problem is genuinely complex
Things like understanding natural language, recognizing images, predicting patterns—these are hard problems where AI excels.
Users are already struggling
You're not creating new behavior; you're making existing behavior easier.
The benefit is significant
It should save major time, money, or frustration. Small improvements don't justify the cost.
You have the resources
Both money and time to build it right. A half-baked AI feature is worse than no AI feature.
It fits your roadmap
Does this align with where your product is going? Or is it a distraction from more important work?
Instead of asking "Should we add AI?", ask:
Then ask: "Would AI help solve any of these better than other approaches?"
This way, AI becomes a tool to solve real problems, not a feature looking for a purpose.
AI is powerful. But it's not magic, and it's not always the answer.
Before you commit budget, time, and engineering resources to an AI feature:
The best products use AI where it matters and skip it where it doesn't. Your job isn't to have the most AI—it's to build something users love.
So the next time someone pitches you an AI feature, try the cover-up test. Your users (and your budget) will thank you.
Need help deciding which features are worth building? Whether it's AI or anything else, we can help you prioritize your roadmap and make smart technology decisions. Get in touch for guidance on your product strategy and development.